Top 5 Boring "Classic" Board and Card Games

Updated on July 18, 2017

Board and card games are a great way for friends to come together and compete in a variety of fun ways. At least, theoretically. Unfortunately, several of the best-selling packages fail to engage players. Don't believe me? Let's check out five surprisingly boring classic board games!

Verkochte dobbelspel indeed
Verkochte dobbelspel indeed

5. Yahtzee

This game may not be board, but you'll be. Yahtzee has participants (more like victims) roll dice to obtain higher scores than other players. The game utilizes point systems similar to poker, with bonuses like "three of a kind" or a "straight". Here are the issues:

  • Incredibly luck-based
  • More complex than most
  • Lacks any interesting theme
  • Just play Poker, it's basically the same thing

Okay, I understand just about every board and card game involves some degree of luck, but there's just not enough strategy here to be engaging. The only choices you make are which die to reroll. Play Poker instead, it's the same game but shorter.

Even worse, for such a simple, luck-dependent premise (score the most points), the game is surprisingly complex in terms of points. Just check out how long the wikihow article on Yathzee is.

Finally, the base version of the game contains no theme, making it lack any sort of aesthetic value. From theme to gameplay, Yahtzee is mundane.

Chutes and Ladders
Chutes and Ladders

4. Chutes and Ladders

The most famous version of "Snakes and Ladders", Chutes tasks players with reaching the end of the board first. You'll move by either spinning a spinner or rolling a die, then moving that value forward. Land on a chute and you plummet further down the board; a ladder lets you advance towards your goal. Here are the problems:

  • Completely luck-based
  • First player gets an advantage
  • Choking Hazard is the most interesting part of the game

Because there are no elements other than moving, which is completely dependent on luck, you never make any choices. You just hope your rolls/spins treat you well, and then brag about how awesome you are when you win, or how stupid the game is when you lose. Yea, that's right Kyle, you deserve that chute you ungrateful screwup.

Admittedly, Chutes introduces a morality theme where children who are selfish must descend chutes while kind children are rewarded and advance up ladders. While that's a good lesson for kids, it can't save the game from intense monotony.

War
War

3. War

You know, war is probably named after the effect it has on nations who play it.

Players grab a normal card deck, randomly deal half to each player, then each reveals the top card of their deck. The higher value wins, and that player receives both cards. This process repeats until one player wins the entire deck. A tie results in both players setting a card facedown, then revealing the next top card; whoever wins gets all six cards. Here are the issues:

  • Again, totally luck-based
  • Lacks any theme
  • Games drag on far too long

If players want a luck-based game, they might as well flip a coin for fun. War is a slow crawl towards defeat where the player who was dealt more higher values in the deck (either Aces or Jokers) wins 99% of the time.

The only way to defeat someone with a higher value is to tie, hope they put their highest value card as their facedown, then win the next revealed clash. That's just not gonna happen much, and even when it does, it's still entirely luck based. Taking a player's entire deck will almost certainly require hours; most people give up to go perform more interesting activities, like watching paint dry.

While it's cool that you can play War with a normal deck of cards, making a boring game cheap doesn't vanquish its stale experience.

Monopoly
Monopoly

2. Monopoly

That's right, the best-selling board game of all time is undoubtedly one of the least interesting. Players compete to earn the most money by buying locations and collecting taxes from opponents who land on their property. Same issues as before:

  • Luck-based
  • Way, way too long
  • Handling money further slackens the game

When the box says it's 8+, it must be referring to the number of years necessary to finish it. There is no strategy here. To win, buy every property you land on and hope you collect them faster than your rivals. Once all lands are bought, play becomes an immensely uninteresting lumber towards victory for the player with the most purchases.

While almost everyone has played this game, very few ever finish because it's obvious who will win hours before it happens; why extend the drab experience longer than necessary?

Themed versions of Monopoly thankfully add other elements to mix up the gameplay (Pokemon Monopoly is surprisingly fun), but the base edition fails on all counts.

Candy Land
Candy Land

1. Candy Land

This game. This game right here. Can it even be called a game? Can I call a piece of lint food because you can technically eat it? Candy Land has players try to reach the end of the board first. There's just one teensy little problem:

  • You have no impact on this game

Candy Land's outcome is literally decided before the game begins. You draw a card and advance to where it tells you. Whoever's cards happen to take them to the end first will win. Heck, Chutes and Ladders has no strategy, but at least there the outcome is uncertain at first because you, to an extent, impact the spins.

Candy Land doesn't even let you semi-control the movement with die or a spinner. It's not really a game so much as a flashy piece of cardboard designed to catch the eyes of kids attracted to the bright colors. Mercifully, the "game" doesn't last as long as War or Monopoly, but at least they pretend to have strategy.

In short, Princess Lolly can go jump off a bridge for all we care.

Your Vote

While it's disappointing to revisit "classics" and realize how lifeless some are, there exist a plethora of interesting and inventive board games. Keep an eye out for those gems, and vote for your most hated of today's batch!

Which game do you dislike the most?

See results

Questions & Answers

    Comments

      0 of 8192 characters used
      Post Comment

      • profile image

        Helga 

        3 months ago

        Me and my girlfriend started playing 4 of those (except Candy Land because we don't own it) and our relationship improved. Maybe it's just us, or the games do have redeeming qualities which makes them fun.

        Chess doesn't work for us because of high difference in skill levels.

        Overly complex themed board games are hard to learn to play properly.

        These, on the other hand, are very easy to learn and they give everyone a chance to win, it's not always the best skilled person like in chess.

      • profile image

        boringgame231 

        6 months ago

        yeah i agree. battleship is really boring.

      • profile image

        slayer171 

        17 months ago

        battleship too. Just boring random guesses with very little strategy

      working

      This website uses cookies

      As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hobbylark.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

      For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hobbylark.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

      Show Details
      Necessary
      HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
      LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
      Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
      AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
      HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
      HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
      Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
      CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
      Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
      Features
      Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
      Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
      Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
      Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
      Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
      VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
      PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
      Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
      MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
      Marketing
      Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
      Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
      Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
      Statistics
      Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
      ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
      Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)