The Deck Archetypes of Competitive EDH

Updated on October 10, 2019
Devon Lemieux profile image

Devon has been playing Magic since 1994. He is an enthusiastic player who mainly enjoys the Legacy, Vintage, and Competitive EDH formats.

Most of the formats in Magic: The Gathering have the same deck archetypes. Usually, these are Control, Aggro, Combo, and Midrange decks. However, as you move up to the higher power formats, the lines tend to blur a little bit. You can have decks that are multiple types, and this is no different for competitive EDH.

In this article, I am going to talk about the main archetypes that you will see in a competitive EDH game and which commanders fit well with those archetypes. These deck types are listed in no particular order.

1. Combo

First, I'm going to get the big one out of the way. It's no secret that Competitive EDH has a lot of combo decks in it. These decks seek to win as quickly as possible, at all costs. They tend to have lots of mana acceleration, tutors, engine cards, and lots of counterspells to push their combos through. I've played many games where the game is over in literally three or four turns.

Many of these decks use a Doomsday win condition, along with Laboratory Maniac. They seek to either draw through their entire deck, mill their entire deck, or set up a winning Doomsday pile.

Another more recent win condition is through the use of Aetherflux Reservoir. These decks are typically storm decks that seek to cast either a lot of cheap spells, or repeatedly play the same spell over and over with some kind of recursion.

The last major win condition in combo is through the use of Food Chain. Typically, you're going to get Food Chain out, and search for any number of creatures that can be cast from exile to generate infinite mana. Most of the time, this mana is used to cast a lethal Walking Ballista to kill all of your opponents at once.

The main strengths of these combo decks are that they are often very consistent with the use of all of the tutors available in EDH. They are extremely fast with all of the access to mana acceleration we have in the format. And finally, they can often win from nowhere, and it's often too late to stop them once they get going.

The major weakness of most of these combo decks is that they operate on a very low card advantage. Many times, you attempt to execute your combo and are left with little or no resources if someone disrupts you in some way. Often times you'll just be out of the game from that point forward while someone else combos and wins.

Below are some of the major combo commanders in Competitive EDH:

Click thumbnail to view full-size

2. Control

Control is, without a doubt, my favorite archetype in any format that I play. I love the variety of choices and timing that are present throughout most games. I also love winning through attrition, as opposed to racing for the combo.

It is often very difficult to effectively play a pure control game in CEDH. In most formats, you only need to control one opponent, and therefore you can trade cards with your opponent until they run out of resources. There is a real problem playing control against three other players who could very well all be playing extremely powerful combos that must be answered. You will run out of resources rather quickly playing against multiple players and be left with your defenses down. In a lot of ways, the Stax archetype handles multiple players much more efficiently.

With that said, there are definitely a few strategies that have been shown to perform at a decent level. However, almost every control deck I have had success with will also have at least one combo to finish the game once you have your opponents controlled.

The decks that typically succeed will have some kind of engine to keep pace with the whole table, and all of the tutors needed to find the engine pieces. The commander itself is, many times, part of this engine. Tasigur is an example of this type of control commander. He is part of a combo (milling your deck) and actually uses diplomacy (very unusual in CEDH) to have some of the players at the table help you control the other players by getting control spells back from the graveyard.

I personally am a big fan of Breya as a control commander. She is removal, life gain, and combo potential all on one card. Having these types of repeatable effects can be really key in keeping pace with multiple opponents.

Below are some of the control commanders in CEDH.

Click thumbnail to view full-size

3. Stax

Stax is a deck archetype that I rarely play. It's not because I don't like making my opponent's miserable. It has more to do with the way these decks slow the whole game down to a crawl, where everyone is playing draw go, waiting for someone to draw into some kind of answer to your stax pieces.

Stax decks really seek to control the game through asymmetric resource denial. Your deck is designed to operate in some way in the environment where no one has mana, can't untap their cards, and generally can't play a normal game of magic.

Cards like Static Orb, Smokestacks, Winter Orb, Null Rod, and Ethersworn Canonist all limit the game in some fundamental way. Most powerful decks in this format simply cannot operate on these types of hindrances to their gameplan.

The real strength of Stax decks are in their ability to deal with streamlined combo decks. They take every advantage away from these decks and turn them into disadvantages.

One notable new addition to this cadre of commanders is Jhoira, Weatherlight Captain. What makes her notable is that she is actually a Stax / Combo commander, which is somewhat unusual.

Muldrotha, the Gravetide is another new card that is showing a lot of promise as a Stax commander.

Here are some Stax commanders below:

Click thumbnail to view full-size

4. Midrange

For the sake of conversation, I'm going to kind of lump a bunch of decks into this category. The midrange decks in CEDH are those that are doing something extremely powerful that doesn't necessarily immediately win the game. They are proactive and often operate off of some kind of engine. Sometimes the commander is, themselves, the engine card. Once these decks get their engine going, it is very unlikely that the opponents will have the ability to win the game.

In a lot of ways, Midrange and Control decks in CEDH have a lot in common. They typically have the ability to interact while pushing forward their own gameplan. There is also a lot of common ground between Stax and Midrange in the sense that they tend to be more permanent-based.

Midrange decks will typically have some type of combo in the deck, but they aren't built to win at all costs. The combos are typically based on some kind of synergy between already decent, valuable cards.

Here are some midrange commanders below:

Click thumbnail to view full-size

5. Aggro

For as long as I can remember, Aggro decks simply did not exist in CEDH. They simply could not beat a table of three opponents fast enough to be relevant. That seems to have changed with the release of the Battlebond set and the introduction of Najeela, the Blade-Blossom.

With that said, the Najeela deck isn't a run-of-the-mill aggro deck. It plays a lot more like a tempo deck, where you protect your threat long enough to generate mana over and over again to use her activated ability. In a lot of ways, this would be better classified as a combo-aggro deck.

Another fairly recent addition to this archetype is Yuriko, the Tiger's Shadow. This deck runs very differently from Najeela. Yuriko's ability lets you damage multiple enemies at once, which really addresses the main problem of aggro decks in this format : running out of steam after killing one opponent, only to lose to the rest.

Click thumbnail to view full-size


Combo is king in CEDH, and it's not really a big surprise to see why. These decks have access to fast mana, cheap tutors, and free counterspells to protect their combo. They also can win very quickly through a variety of different ways.

But that doesn't mean you can't play the archetype you like. The whole purpose of this article is to show newer players that decks do exist from different archetypes and give them a starting point to build their decks. I will be breaking down each archetype further in my future articles, so stay tuned.

So what do you think? What is your favorite archetype? What commander do you like the best? Let me know in the comments below.

Questions & Answers

    © 2018 Devon Lemieux


      0 of 8192 characters used
      Post Comment

      No comments yet.


      This website uses cookies

      As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

      For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

      Show Details
      HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
      LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
      Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
      AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
      HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
      HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
      Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
      CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
      Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
      Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
      Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
      Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
      Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
      Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
      VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
      PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
      Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
      MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
      Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
      Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
      Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
      Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
      ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
      Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
      ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)